These incidents center around one central theme- human interaction with wildlife. Most often, if not always, the wildlife suffers at the hands of human intervention. Now I am not going to debate here on the value of a human life as was the potential case in Cincinnati. However, I would like to make a request that people take a second and review their actions in regard to wildlife and the natural world.
In this paper Taylor presented the foundational structure for a life-centered theory of environmental ethics.
The structures according to Taylor are based on three categories which are related. The first part of the structure is called respect for nature. What this section of the article basically talked about was how human being only respects living things.
And it also mentioned how if we as human beings were to adapt to the life-centered system of environmental ethics, the way in which e view the world right now will have to have to change we would be caring for nature more than we are now.
In order to prove his argument he was able to relate the argument with the anthropocentric vie,h. In the anthropocentric view, human actions affecting the natural environment and its nonhuman inhabitants are right or wrong by either of two criteria: From this human-centered standpoint it is to humans and only to humans that all duties are ultimately owed James.
We as human have no obligation to promote or protect the good of nonhuman living things. The difference between the life-centered system of environmental ethic and the human- centered system of environmental ethic is in life centered system as noted earlier we as human will have more duty to the nature.
Our duties to respect the integrity of natural ecosystems, to preserve endangered species, and to avoid environmental pollution stem from the fact that these are ways in which we can help make it possible for wild species populations to achieve and maintain a healthy existence in a natural state Taylor.
We could no longer simply take the human point of view ND consider the effects of our actions exclusively from the perspective of our own good. The evidence that the author used to justify the respect of nature is by making clear the fundamental moral attitude that underlies and makes intelligible the commitment to live by such a system.
The second part of the structure is a belief system that constitutes a way of conceiving of the natural world and of our place in it. This section focuses more on the perception of obstetric outlook on nature.
In this paper, will be conducting an analysis of the article “The Ethics of Respect for nature” written by Paul W. Taylor. In this paper Taylor presented the foundational structure for a life-centered theory of environmental ethics. The Ethics of Respect for Nature. Paul W. Taylor* I present the foundational structure for a life-centered theory of environmental ethics. The structure consists of three interrelated components. The Ethics of Respect for Nature Lately I have been saddened by a series of unfortunate events that have become all to common. These incidents center around one central theme- .
Third, each individual organism is conceived of as a teleological center of life, pursuing its own good in its own way. And the last component, whether we are concerned with standards of merit or with the concept of inherent worth, the claim that humans by their very nature are superior to other species is a groundless claim and, in the light of elements 1 2and 3 above, must be rejected as nothing more than an irrational bias in our own favor Taylor.
To further understand his argument he was able to relate human with other species in a biological aspect.
The laws of genetics, of natural selection, and of adaptation apply equally to all of us as biological creatures. In this lightly consider ourselves as one with them, not set apart from them. We, as well as they, must face certain basic conditions of existence that impose requirements on us for our survival and well-being.
Each animal and plant is like us in having a good of its own. What differentiate us humans from any other species according to Taylor is our good. This argument is reasonable because, although our human good what is of true value in unman life, including the exercise of individual autonomy in choosing our own particular value systems is not like the good of a nonhuman animal or plant, it can no more be realized than their good can without the biological necessities for survival and physical health Taylor.
Taylor also argued about the possibility of extinction. The possibility of the extinction of the human species, a possibility which starkly confronts us in the contemporary world, makes us aware of another respect in which we should not consider ourselves privileged beings in relation to other species.
This argument has some strength to it because according to biology, the well-being of humans is dependent upon the ecological soundness and health of many plant and animal communities, while their soundness and health does not in the least depend upon human well-being.
Thinking about it, one can argue that the existence of the human race is not necessary. On the contrary, many of them would be greatly benefited. The poisoning and polluting of their environment would come to an end.The Ethics of Respect for Nature Essay Sample.
Paul Taylor envisioned the possibility of a life centered system through the workings of two concepts.
|See a Problem?||Under deontology, an act may be considered right even if the act produces a bad consequence,  if it follows the rule or moral law.|
|The Ethical Respect of Nature - Ethical Free Essays||Finally, when our awareness focuses on the individual lives of plants and animals, each is seen to share with us the characteristic of being a teleological center of life striving to realize its own good in its own unique way.|
|Get Full Essay||The Concept of Respect Among the main questions about respect that philosophers have addressed are these: Philosophers have variously identified it as a mode of behavior, a form of treatment, a kind of valuing, a type of attention, a motive, an attitude, a feeling, a tribute, a principle, a duty, an entitlement, a moral virtue, an epistemic virtue:|
The first concept being the good, or well-being, of a living thing. This concept entails doing what is necessary for the welfare of nature. The Ethics of Respect for Nature.
more practical significance of this project lies in defining the normative or ethical repercussions that follow from acknowledging IV in nonhuman nature. Respect for Natureprovides both a full account of the biological conditions for life--human or otherwise--and a comprehensive view of the complex relationship between human beings and the whole of nature.
Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. The field of ethics, along with aesthetics, concern matters of value, and thus comprise the branch of philosophy called axiology..
Ethics seeks to resolve questions of human morality by defining concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong. The Ethics of Respect for Nature.
Paul W. Taylor* I present the foundational structure for a life-centered theory of environmental ethics.
The structure consists of three interrelated components. First is the adopting of a certain ultimate moral attitude toward nature, which I call “respect for nature.”. The ethics of respect for nature is made up of three basic elements: a belief system. then there remains the task of indicating why scientifically informed and rational thinkers with a developed capacity of reality awareness can find it acceptable as a way of conceiving of the natural world and our place in it.